Wednesday, 26 August 2015

The guilty pleasure of schadenfreude

I have a confession to make. I, who have loudly and loquaciously expressed my scorn for those sorry souls who follow the anguished antics of TV Reality shows as if their very lives depended on being able to answer the most obscure questions about each episode, have succumbed to the seductive lure of telly-voyeurism. Every night I rush through dinner preparations so that I can slump into my seat in the TV room in time to ingest the daily serving of ‘The X Factor’ or ‘(Insert country’s name)’s Got Talent’ (yes, I have even sunk that low) along with my meal.

It all began with ‘So you think you can dance’. I am a lifelong dance-fan and unashamedly addicted to excellence so not even Mary Murphy’s ear-splitting screech could derail my determination to devour every carefully-choreographed movement of these supremely gifted dancers. That is all well and good. But when I realised, one night, that I was glued to the goggle-box watching four young women with equally unattractive personalities cruelly criticize each other’s weddings, I knew that I was perilously close to passing the point of no return. It was a telling moment and the prelude to one of those long, dark nights of the soul. But the next night I was back in my seat, muttering imprecations at Simon and the Gang while munching my microwave meal.

What floors me is that we all know full well that these programmes are not the unscripted, spontaneous ‘window into my world’ affairs that the networks would have us believe we are watching. For a start, I have deep-seated doubts about whether people are capable of behaving normally, let alone naturally, when they know their every move is being recorded for the critical consumption of the media-mad masses. You don’t have to be an anthropologist to deduce from the way spectators of all colours and creeds react when they realise that they have caught the roving eye of the ubiquitous camera man that exposure to the spotlight triggers strange behaviour among members of our species.

 Nor will you convince me that there is no direction at all from the producers of these shows. It’s all about ratings, after all, and if a programme is deemed to be boring by a viewing public that is insatiable in its search for sensation, it has as much chance of making the big time as the clueless contestant whose performance earned her three red crosses and a standing boo. Characters and contexts are carefully manipulated to elicit the maximum mileage from every scenario.

The reality is that there is no such thing as ‘reality television’ – apart from the news and sports channels, and there is considerable justification for excluding those categories from the list these days. So what is it about these shows that we find so fascinating?

I suspect it’s all about emotional voyeurism. We are able to step aside from the complex challenges of our own realities and live vicariously, sniffing sympathetically with the recipient of the cheque from the ‘secret millionaire’ (I love the paradox of ‘secret’ in the context of a televised reality show) or grinding our teeth in frustration at the outrageous attitudes of rebellious teenagers whose incorrigible behaviour has earned them a sojourn with super-strict parents in ‘remote places’ (like South Africa!). The changes those grumpy grown-ups can apparently achieve in two weeks is nothing short of miraculous and I am surprised that the penal system hasn’t cottoned on and hired them to sort out all those maximum security prisoners!

Then there is the opportunity to live out our dreams of fame and fortune without the fear-factor of making a public patsy of oneself. We watch in awed admiration as (yet another) star is born and cheer them on their meteoric rise with the same genuine enthusiasm with which we mock the cringe-worthy capering of talent-challenged wannabes who should have listened to their enemies instead of their friends. If truth be told there are some striking and rather disturbing similarities between our enjoyment of reality shows and the Roman crowds packing the stands of the Coliseum as they followed the fortunes of the gladiators and bayed for first blood in Christians vs Lions… with one important difference. In our 21st century cyber-version of ‘the games’, the victims are volunteers.

And that, I believe, is the real attraction of reality shows. I think it was Confucius who sagely observed that there is little more amusing than watching one’s neighbour fall off his roof but civilization has handicapped us with an inconvenient sense of guilt about indulging in the sin of schadenfreude. Enter Reality TV.  Deep down, where our consciences live in cramped quarters, we know that they are not real and that any suffering that is endured is, in the final analysis, self-inflicted.
And so, until they find the formula for calorie-free chocolate, you will find me in front of my flat-screen most evenings, indulging in my daily dose of emotional therapy. After all, contrary to what Karl Marx claimed, TV is the real opiate of the masses.

 

 
schadenfreude

Friday, 14 August 2015

It's the real thing...or is it?

Several years ago I was advised to avoid dairy products. I must have been at an unprecedentedly low ebb because I mutely bowed to the inevitable and doggedly eschewed all of my favourite foods. Dark days followed during which I was tortured by the memory of the sensuously smooth texture of chocolate melting on my tongue. Friends, partly out of concern for my psychological health but primarily bored by my relentless (and very vocal) self-pity, introduced me to a chocolate substitute, carob. At first I was ecstatic. This carob stuff had potential: it was brown, sweet, and it melted in the mouth. But try as I might – and I was nothing if not persistent in my endeavours! – I was achingly aware that there was something lacking in the substitute that I still craved. It just wasn’t the real thing.

Since the late 1960s the purveyors of a certain carbonated beverage have been exhorting us to drink ‘the real thing’ (1969), to ‘look for the real things’ (1974), to be ‘real’ (2003) and to ‘make it real’ (2005).[1] You even hear people take their leave from friends with the friendly admonition to ‘keep it real’. But when you view this apparent determination to keep in touch with the feel of the real in the context of a world where so much time, money and energy is devoted to disguising reality or replacing it with a more-pleasing fiction, you could be forgiven for quirking a quizzical eyebrow – if you still can after that latest Botox treatment!
I would be the first to admit that reality very seldom resembles a Disney fairy-tale. In real life, it is far more likely that Cinderella was tidying her sisters’ closets when the Prince dropped by for an impromptu shoe fitting, with the result that he probably ended up marrying a girl whose bunions made her more bad-tempered every year. Snow White may have started out by being the fairest of them all but I am fairly convinced that gravity had its wicked way with her as with the rest of us and it would not be long before that poor mirror would once again be trying to find a tactful way to break the news that even the type of beauty that can stop seven short-sighted dwarfs in their tracks has a sell-by-date. We can all be forgiven for having a wistful wish-list but when did we turn our backs on reality and set about creating our own fairy-tale world? And when did the ingredients of the fairy-tale – beauty, wealth, and the promise of a highly-publicized happy-ever-after – become the only recipe for a successful life?
Now there is nothing wrong with being successful but somewhere along the timeline we have redefined success to mean having the best, looking the best, and being the best... with the best publicity. The trouble is that being the best is, by its very nature, exclusive; only one person can be the best at any one thing at any one time – which makes the rest of us ‘wannabes’, feeling like failures as we strive to emulate someone who, in reality, may be struggling to measure up to his or her own public image. 
Image is the carob version of identity. In our counterfeit culture we’ve substituted style for substance, charisma for character, status for security, and quantity for quality - but deep down we hunger for the ‘real thing’.
The ‘real thing’ we all crave is the security of knowing that we are accepted for who we are, as we are. The tragedy is that we don’t feel acceptable as we are and so we don our masks and try to be someone else. Oscar Wilde said “Be yourself, everyone else is already taken” but until we bravely remove our masks and accept ourselves, warts and all, we will continue to idealise impossible idols instead of devoting our energy and talents to truly becoming the best  - the unique individuals each of us was created to be.
Only then will we have a chance of living out a real-life ‘happy-ever-after’.